« John Mayer... In Amsterdam. 'Nuff Said! | Main | Kate in Neon »
Did we know Kim was as voluptuous up front as she is in the back?
Of course we did - it was a rhetorical question!
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://x17online.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/12210
I think she looks pregant.It well be a nappy headed balck kid but she well have to go on Muary show to find out who the baby daddy is.
Nasty whore;
Um, yes. Yes, we did. She is a talentless skank who dresses like a $10 trannyhooker (with apologies to $10 trannyhookers everywhere).
Anyone with so little class and self esteem who would allow themselves to be taped having sex is really not worthy of the attention she gets.
Talk about defining the term "attention whore."
She looks like a high-paid prostitute, not even a classy ho-bag! Have some respect girl! Another rich wannabe celeb who uses her skankiness to attract attention to herself, she belongs in a trailer park living next door to the Jerry Springer rejects!
at least she is covered up. she looks like shit in a bikini . huge hips! Yuck!
do we honestly freakin' care! she so fake and not that pretty...
She is so stunning. A truly beautiful girl. Of course, in America they probably think she's overweight. They love sticks there.
Physically, she's perfect. And she does whatever she wants with her OWN life.
does anybody know where her dress is from?it's so cute! people need to stop being so rude and hating on celebrities though, it's sad you have nothing better to do. she is just a person and looks great.
She is such a refreshing beauty. She has real curves, a gorgeous face, and a lovely personality. She is way better than all those skinny blonde/blues we have forced down our throats here in America!
Uh yeh we knew, we've all seen the hairy fat whore on video getting railed by a black shermhead remember?
Most Commented Stories
Most Commented Galleries
Facebook
Tweet
