x17 France

« Paris Votes In Style! | Main | L&S's Cover Story On Britney's Mental Illness! »

Lilo and S.Ro On Obama's Win: "Yes We Did!"

Lindsay Lohan lindsaysammyspaceblog.jpg

Lindsay Lohan and her girlfriend Sam celebrated Obama's win last night with matching blog posts on their joint MySpace Celebrity blog:

    YES WE CAN

    Lindsay Lohan

    Tuesday, November 04, 2008

    OBAMA IS OUR PRESIDENT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    everyone that voted, no matter their choice...should be proud for voting in the first place :)

    YES WE DID!!
    Samantha Ronson

    Tuesday, November 04, 2008

    yay
    yay
    yay
    yay
    yay
    yay
    yay
    yay
    yay

How eloquent, right?

Although, they can't be too happy about the fact that it seems Prop 8 is going to pass in California. Check out what Lindz had to say about her voting choices in the vid below!



I guess there may not be a Rohan wedding soon after all!

SEE MORE:
  >   Lilo And Her Supersize Smackers Make An Appearance - Sep 15, 2009
  >   Where In The World Is Lindsay Lohan! - Sep 14, 2009
  >   The Face Of An Angel - Sep 13, 2009
  >   LiLo Ten Hours Late To Photo Shoot! - Sep 13, 2009
  >   Lindsay Lohan "Aspired To Be Like Britney Spears In The Tabloids" - Sep 12, 2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://x17online.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/16135

COMMENTS
Posted by: Anonymous

I saw she has a personal blog on ^^^^^^MillionaireLoving. C O M^^ ^^^^, a private site for millionaire & celebrity I heard of from a friend of mine. Does she want to hook up with strong guys?



Posted by: oscar

Really?
My friend recommended me a very interesting place ____ MillionaireLover.Com ____ It's where wealthy singles looking for someone to enjoy their wealthy lifestyle with.



Posted by: YoBaMa

TOO BAD FOR PROP "8" MUTHA FUCKERS!



Posted by: Anonymous

isn't samantha british??



Posted by: Yee_Haw

YES WE DID!!! (pass prop 8)
yay
yay
yay
yay
yay
yay
yay
yay
yay



Posted by: Becky

You f'n California people think you can f'n dictate everything..... who our president will be, where we can f'n smoke in this country etc. Too f'n bad about Prop 8



Posted by: Anonymous

I'm disappointed about prop 8. It's wrong to keep rights available for only certain groups of people and discriminate others. Scholarly-sophisticated people voted no on h8te...I thought we were a progressive state. Even the Supreme Court wants to end discrimination! WHY CAN'T THE RELIGOUS PEOPLE GET ON BOARD!!!! IT'S ABOUT EQUALITY...GOD would want you to treat everyone with fairness.



Posted by: Anonymous

So- unless someone agrees with you're agenda, they're not scholarly or sophisticated? Sorry you're disappointed, but, they people of CA have spoken. "YES WE CAN"



Posted by: Anonymous

So- unless someone agrees with you're agenda, they're not scholarly or sophisticated? Sorry you're disappointed, but, the people of CA have spoken. "YES WE CAN"



Posted by: Anonymous

What you've concluded shows fallacy in logic itself. Go take logical reasoning 101



Posted by: Anonymous

All apples are red but all red does not necessarily equate to being apples.



Posted by: Anonymous

And if you're not red doesn't mean you're not an apple.

This just shows the people who have spoken may not be intelligent enough to recognize progress and WANT it.



Posted by: Hard times ahead--hide your $$

Ask these liberal "L" friends in 10 months what they think. They may feel like the snake oil salesman gave them a bum deal full of empty promises. Oh and what happened with Prop 8 --giggle.



Posted by: Anonymous

1:12pm
Lemme guess, you didn't vote for Obama just because he's Black.



Posted by: Anonymous

I didn't vote for Obama because he's a liberal. He's an intelligent, eloquent man but I happen to disagree with his politics. It doesn't matter now, the US people have spoken and I've accepted the decision and will support him, as should we all. Can those of you who opposed 8 say the same thing? I thought not. The far left is only interested in democracy if the majority votes their way.



Posted by: Anonymous

3:28 Have you ever considered that the people who spoke recognized the situation for what it was and didn't want it? You say progress, we say "hijacking the definition of marriage". Doesn't really matter now though does it? Have a nice day.



Posted by: Anonymous

Think hard about why you don't want to expand the definition of marriage...Earlier the definition of marriage was only valid for whites marrying whites and others marrying others. Is it not progress to recognize all races as equals? This is a civil rights matter and it's going to be challenged in court. Sorry if you can't expand your mind to encompass a complex world.



Posted by: Talk To The Hand

We don't want to expand the definition of marriage because it not only goes against most religions - but it ALSO flies in the face of science.

Perpetuation of the species is reliant on opposites mating (not like and kind).

Personally, I think there should be a Lesbian Island and a Gay Island. Then when you sick MF's die off, we'll finally be RID OF YOU.

How's that for Only Slightly Tolerant?



Posted by: Anonymous

ps: You can re-invent religion all you like, but science is science - and wishing just doesn't make it necessarily so.

If LiLo and Ronson were TRULY lesbians, one of them wouldn't have to feel the need to dress up like a Stud Broad. They'd be comfortable just being two real women who happen to be attracted to each other.

Most Gays and Lesbians are nothing more than confused play-actors.



Posted by: Anonymous

So if they're gonna die off anyways...why not let them get married?



Posted by: Anonymous

9:38 are you completely stupid?
maybe samantha dresses the way she does cos thats how she feels comfortable.
Not all girls have to wear dresses and not all boys have to be super manly.
Or are you too stupid to realise that?



Posted by: Anonymous

i meant 9:36



Posted by: Anonymous

Those damn heterosexual people continue to breed gay kids!



Posted by: Anonymous

I'm disappointed about prop 8. It's wrong to keep rights available for only certain groups of people and discriminate others. Scholarly-sophisticated people voted no on h8te...I thought we were a progressive state. Even the Supreme Court wants to end discrimination! WHY CAN'T THE RELIGOUS PEOPLE GET ON BOARD!!!! IT'S ABOUT EQUALITY...GOD would want you to treat everyone with fairness.

TOTALLY AGREE!







This part is optional!


Note: Your comment will post in 5 minutes. Practice patience and don't double your efforts. Thank you.

X17 Mobile
X17 on Twitter!
Sell Your Scoop
Hot Pix