X17 Japan



« 9021Oops! | Main | An Applegate A Day... »

Lilo Says NO To Playboy!!

Lindsay Lohan LLOHANBEACH070407_17_X17.jpg

Lindsay Lohan turned down a $700,000 offer to do an eight-page topless spread in Playboy's 55th-anniversary issue this January, according to the New York Post. Lohan's rep told Playboy's creative consultant, Hal Lifson, "If there's nudity, then the answer's no...She's not going down the [New York] magazine road again."

Lifson said that he hoped to have Linds do a tribute to 1960s vixen Ann-Margret and her film Kitten With a Whip, which is reportedly one of her favorite movies.

I don't get why it's such a big deal - I mean, we already know what Lindsay's boobs look like, so it's certainly not a matter of her feeling like she's exposing herself. Perhaps if Playboy offered her $2 million she'd be singing a different tune?



Should Lindsay do Playboy? We vote yes!

SEE MORE:
  >   X17 XCLUSIVE - Lindsay Plays Peek A Boo...After A Little Too Much Booze? - Apr 21, 2009
  >   Denied At The Door! - Apr 20, 2009
  >   Lilo Takes Off! - Apr 19, 2009
  >   X17 XCLUSIVE - The Lohan Girls Join The Circus! - Apr 18, 2009
  >   Lindsay's "Right On" - Apr 17, 2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://x17online.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/14185

COMMENTS
Posted by: tancred.s

She looks beautiful and sexy. I saw her profile on milllionaire&celeb personals site """"C e l e b C u p i d.c o m""""""last week. It is said she is dating young billionaire on that site.--------------



Posted by: I hate shitney and both of her moronic fans

@ tancred.s oh, I so want to meet all those rich desperate women out there. Does ANYONE actual go to your shitty site. Drop dead asswipe.



Posted by: Anonymous

Her tits are the only good thing about her



Posted by: keep it up linds

The HoHan seems to be getting her life together, and that's good. No matter what a lot of bloggers say, she is a good actress and is also very pretty. Loves her!



Posted by: Anonymous

dyke



Posted by: Anonymous

$700,000 LMAO



Posted by: Anonymous

September 5, 2008 10:21 AM
Posted by: keep it up linds

To make it clear... she does look like she is getting her life together, she is definitly NOT a good actress, and her looks are so-so.. i'd hit it



Posted by: Anonymous

Lilo's def smarter and hotter than Shitney, that's not saying much but I call it like I see it. Too bad she switched teams.



Posted by: life goes on...

Ha, 750...that says alot...pathetic, how lowwwww you can goooo in such a short time. There is nothing that will bring her back...she's dammaged material now.
Also, I dont ever think she is smarter than Britney, any smart celebrity knows to keep their personal buss and preferences out of the media.



Posted by: freckle-hater

on behalf of america -- thank you lindsay.



Posted by: pms_24_7_365

Actually, for her age, her boobs are looking a little bit saggy. Why would Playboy want to show freckled, saggy boobs?



Posted by: Jay

Actually she is a VERY GOOD actress, she's fucking hot as hell, and to poster 2:21...you aren't speaking for me....I wouldn't mind AT all to see a naked Lindsay Lohan! She's the hottest H-wood actress out there BY FAR.



Posted by: raven

I don't think it's the money. I think she thinks that would be a really trashy thing to do. I am glad she said no to it. Although man would I love to see it. ;)



Posted by: alisss

yeah i really doubt its about money. she seems alot more sensible recently so she's probably just learned her lesson and doesn't want to do it again.



Posted by: alisss

yeah i really doubt its about money. she seems alot more sensible recently so she's probably just learned her lesson and doesn't want to do it again.



Posted by: alisss

yeah i really doubt its about money. she seems alot more sensible recently so she's probably just learned her lesson and doesn't want to do it again.



Posted by: Slick Willy

and the article would have been so entertaining ;)



Posted by: I'd pay it!

If she had a hot girlfriend instead of that sickly looking meth-head, they probably would have paid 10 times more to have both pose seductivly.



Posted by: Anonymous

I thought Playboy was supposed to be a "classy" magazine. Why would they ask Lindsay to be in it? She's Hustler material, not Playboy.



Posted by: Anonymous

i don't see why she would do playboy when she will be doing porn pretty soon. did you see the trailer for her new movie labor pains? it's on youtube. it's basically knocked up, but without the laughs. she can do both gay and straight porn films since she's gone both ways. did you see that picture of her with her tongue in samantha ronson's mouth that was posted on tmz yesterday? the only thing i can think of that will prevent her from being a porn star is that she probably has so many stds that even the people in porn may say that's too much for them.



Posted by: ..

Would a full seductive nudity spread have been accepted...?? Maybe she is tired or bearing only her breasts and she maybe thinks PLayboy is dissin' on the rest of her??







This part is optional!


Note: Your comment will post in 5 minutes. Practice patience and don't double your efforts. Thank you.

X17 Mobile
bikinibecksgal.jpg
Celebrity Street Style
X17 on Twitter!
Sell Your Scoop
Hot Pix