x17 France

« Brad Pitt Does Some Heavy Lifting! | Main | Ryan: "It Was Fantastic" Redmond Was At Farrah's Funeral »

Debbie Rowe IS Going To Fight For The Kids!

DROWE011104_01x.jpg Though we weren't sure whether or not Debbie Rowe would ask for custody or simply continued visitation, NBC LA is reporting that Rowe WILL fight for custody of Paris and Michael Jr., the children born during her marriage to Michael Jackson.

During a 90-minute phone conversation, Rowe told the NBC reporter, "I want my children," and she added that she will seek a restraining order to keep Joe Jackson away from them!

Rowe also says she'll submit to a DNA test to prove she's the biological mother, and she'll also submit to psychological testing.



How do you think THIS will end? Will Debbie or Katherine get the kids?

SEE MORE:
  >   Michael Jackson Was There In Spirit ... - Sep 13, 2009
  >   MJ Is A "Magnet For Miracles" - Sep 13, 2009
  >   Michael Jackson Tribute Concert Postponed Until Next Year - Sep 11, 2009
  >   Michael Jackson Trailer To Premiere During The 2009 VMAs - Sep 10, 2009
  >   Randy Jackson Slams Media Coverage Of MJ's Funeral - Sep 06, 2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://x17online.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/23823

COMMENTS
Posted by: Denise

I surely pray she gets the kids, we don't know what really went down between her & Michael, And she is the only one willing not only prove with DNA, but "psycholoical testing" maybe she is normal. And had an impossible time getting to see the kids when he was alive,.....



Posted by: Anonymous

She's a piece of shit for selling her babies to that freak. The kids should be put up for adoption. Michael wasn't even the biological father.



Posted by: Anonymous

im not sure is a good idea to take the children away and give them to an extranger, if the real reason for her to take the children is for the children safety and becsuse she loves them, she will work it out together with michael parents the only family they know



Posted by: Anonymous2

Really was there any question she wasn't going to go try to get her kids back! Besides the 2 kids look just like her - is there really a need for a DNA test! These poor kids! This battle will go on forever anyway!



Posted by: Anonymous2

Really was there any question she wasn't going to go try to get her kids back! Besides the 2 kids look just like her - is there really a need for a DNA test! These poor kids! This battle will go on forever anyway!



Posted by: Anonymous

What about the youngest one? Doesn't anyone want him? Otherwise Debbie Rowe is the only one young enough to raise them. Katherine Jackson is a wonderful person but she "is" 79 years old....that's too old to take on young children and hope to raise them to adulthood.



Posted by: Anonymous

WHY? So she can split up the two oldest from the youngest?! Ya, after losing their dad that is what they need. She is just disputing so she can try to get more money. Shameful. Debbie was NEVER in those kids life, why be there now when she knows damn well she can't parent them? She is a greedy idiot.



Posted by: Anonymous

Give the kids to Dianna Ross as Michael wanted. Dianna Ross' has a good track record for being a good parent. All her children are well adjusted.

Would you listen to a woman who comes forward to claim you 12 years later and call her mother? You will NOT trust her motive and respect her. In Rowe's case, she was paid for her giving birth to those children. Any child will suspect her motive and not trust her.



Posted by: Anonymous

Those poor children. Look at the judge’s options. A woman who gave her children to a drug addict and a old woman who didn’t stop her husband from beating her children.



Posted by: Anonymous

I can only hop for the best possible outcome to prevail in the custody and future of these innocent kids.



Posted by: Anonymous

MJ was known to ban people from his life. He had the power and money to keep her from the kids if he wanted. Dont assume it's what she wanted. She did try to re-gain parental rights during his molestation trial. The nanny has also said when MJ felt the kids were getting to close to her he would separate her from them for a period of time. He loved his kids but he was very powerful, emotionally unstable man.



Posted by: Anonymous

MJ legacy is starting the grap your crotch move that continues today with rapers. The kids should go to their mother. Maybe this will give them a chance at some form of normal life



Posted by: Anonymous

What matters is what is best for the kids. Micheal's dad was abusive and likely led Micheal to be the way he was. I shudder to think of those children under his roof. There is no right answer here.



Posted by: Anonymous

Good for her; I pray she gets her 2 children and she will win; she'll prove it, DNA tests. MJ's parents cannot prove MJ was the biological father, they don't deserve to raise her 2 children. Where is the mother of the other child ?



Posted by: Denise

Debbie Rowe will take all 3 and raise them like normal kids on a ranch in CA. I am sure she will let the family visit (not Papa Joe) She has volenteer for everything from Blood work to mental tests. Maybe Jacko with his power kept her from the kids and we are making her out to be the evil one when she isn't. Let's see where the cards fall



Posted by: Sunshine : )

Anyone that thinks that Debbie should get the kids, is as crazy as MJ was!! I don't think that his family (Joe/ Katherine) should have them but neither do I think she deserves them!! She was paid to have them, she was paid to give them up and she knew what she was doing when she walked away from them!! She is nothing but a golddiger and she just sees them as dollar signs!! If they give them to her then the SYSTEM sucks!!!



Posted by: Anonymous

OK so Debbie sold her kids, but the whole situation is different now. this custody battle will probably happen sooner or later even if MJ's Mom gets custody of the kids for now. when she dies, then they are passed to fossil Diana Ross?? you go Debbie!! keep that freak Joe from whipping those kids into the performing 3 Fabulous Basters!



Posted by: Moon

Oh yeah!!! Now she is playing the VICTIM after she was paid to give them up!! WHAT A GREAT MOTHER SHE WILL BE!!! If my mother gave me up and was paid for it, I would not want her in my life! She knew what she was doing when she was paid to give them up, why cry about it now!! why pretend that you want your children when all she wants is the money!!!



Posted by: Anonymous

give them to Lisa Marie Presley, at least she keeps her kids out of the spotlight and she knows how to deal with super fame, boatloads of money, and the heavy duty security issues that go along with it!



Posted by: Anonymous

The sleaze sites (like this one) must just love the whole MJ thing. This whole mess will take years to sort out (the kids will probably all be 18 by the time it's resolved), and the only ones to profit will be the lawyers (as usual). That means years worth of juicy nuggets of gossip to spice up sites like this long after Britney and Lilo are in the "where are they now?" columns.



Posted by: Anonymous

just like micheal said

anything...anything...anything for money, i'd lie for u, i would die for u (iii) even sell my soul to the devil...

dont give the kids to this woman for godsake its not what the man wanted. she gave them away...keep them away...give em to katherine or diana. golly.



Posted by: Anonymous

I'M SICK OF SEEING JESSIE JACKSON AND AL SHARPTON ON TV WORSHIPPING MICHAEL LIKE HE WAS GOD THE ALMIGHTY. THE GUY DIDN'T EVEN WANT TO BE BLACK AND MADE SURE HE BOUGHT KIDS WHO WERE 100% WHITE. HE WAS AN INSULT TO ALL AFRICAN AMERICANS.



Posted by: Anonymous

We saw this one coming. These children don't even know Debbie right? Lisa Marie is a thought. She seems great with her own children and she did try to help Michaels mental health.



Posted by: Anonymous

Right On; finally, someone speaks the truth !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



Posted by: Anonymous

1:46 PM. I was referring to your comment ! Right on, for posting a true fact ! By the way, Jesse Jackson looks ugly when he cries. LOL.



Posted by: Anonymous

If his death pushes Britney and Lilo are in the "where are they now?" columns then Thank you Michael!



Posted by: LisaLynn

She SOLD the kids.If she really wanted them or loved them,she would be with them since they were born until now,raising them.But no,she was paid to have them and to give them to Michael.PAID!She used them to get money.The kids aren't dumb and must know she sold them for money and that wants them for the same motive...MONEY,again.They will reject her for the rest of their lives if she gets their custodies.She doesn't love them,she loves the money they will get.They boy is 12 and the girl is 11,almost teenagers.Why would they want to live with a surrogate mother that sold and gave them away when they were babies?She may be the biological mother,but isn't a real mother,never cared for them,gave them love or raised them.I hope she loses the fight for the custody,she made her own choices years ago,now deal with them and the consequences.She should leave the children alone,forget them.She doesn't know them and doesn't love them too.



Posted by: jaye

Katherine Jackson with health problem of her own. is what 79? How soon before they're looking for another caregiver for the kids. If she got Custody of them AND Blanket ( po po Blanket) and hired their former nanny, they will be fine. Other than Micheal they know the nanny better than anyone including Katherine. Whether they know her or not she is their biological mother, they look like HER; hell they probably thought Michael was white the way he looked. But the judge will do what he sees is the best interest of the kids as he should.



Posted by: Anonymous

This bitch's got it goin on!



Posted by: Anonymous

Are you the judge? Nope. STFU



Posted by: Anonymous

Money sucking B Who would let her kids go in the first place. Not mother material in anyones book. KEEP HER OUT OF THERE LIFES!!!



Posted by: Anonymous

A UK newspaper said the nanny is tied to the Nation of Islam.



Posted by: THE OC

wait....didn't she sell off her rights to MJ for teh kids, you just can't come back years later and say "hey I want my kids" after you have sold them off - that is along the lines of adoption..



Posted by: Annonymous

She signed over parental rights in the past, stated that the kids did not feel like her kids. Now they stand to inhert over 200 million dollars and now she wants them. All she wants is Michael's money!



Posted by: Annonymous

She doesn't live like she has any BIG MONEY, yeah she has a ranch, and raises horse, And since 2003 I think she has been trying to see the kids. A judge says she has not lost her rights, nor did she give them up. She has been invited by the court to the hearing on Monday. She hasn't been broadcasting her personal life with Michael all over the place, not then or now. I think Michael had money and kept her away. I think the courts should really look at her to take all 3 kids. They might actually love to be raised on the ranch in the same place for a while. We don't know......



Posted by: Anonymous

I wouldn't trust any of them to walk my dogs.



Posted by: Anonymous

Debbie Rowe has now said she will take all 3 children.
She tried many times to see the children over the years but MJ would not return her phone calls. Katherine Jackson is TOO OLD to raise children this age. What happens if she dies in 5 or so years. Who will want 17 and 18 year olds who will still need a parent?



Posted by: Anonymous

Michael Jackson's kids should not be with Debbie Rowe. They will soon know, if they don't already, that their mother was willing to take money to relinguish her rights. Now, as if they are a pieces of furniture, she is contemplating a cusody battle. Wow! That in itself is a trip to know that she cared more for money than them. That's just as abusive if not more than Michael experienced...:(



Posted by: Anonymous

I hope Debbie Rowe will step up to the plate. I am thinking she is torn about this, is probably feeling sick to her stomach at the thought of raising three children at her stage of life. But if she takes it on, she is indeed to be praised. I don't think money has anything to do with it.



Posted by: Sierra

Those children may be a little resistant to her at first - depending on what Michael told the children about her -- BUT I think that those children should be as far away from Joe Jackson as possible (he is a terrible person, a terrible parent, and Joe Jackson should NOT have any control over those children's life).



Posted by: Anonymous

I think Joe Jackson and his wife should also submitt to DNA testing and get a psychological assessment. If there is any mental health issues found, then a referral for shock treatment should be administered to Oprah Winfrey and Diana Ross, I would say to Whoopie Goldberg as well, but I think she had enough.
lol.



Posted by: Anonymous

I think the kids should be able to have a say and possibly if they want to spend time with debbie they should. Prince and paris are old enuf to voice their opinons.As long as whereever they are they are happy and well cared for nothing else should matter.



Posted by: susan

those children can't be protect always, all these question will never go away. i think they should be answered now.i also feel ms jackson is to old and debbie will be more hands on



Posted by: Lilli

I wonder why Michael did not entrust one of his siblings to mentor his children and keep them within the Jackson clan. If Debbie Rowe gets custody of her two what will happen to Blanket. What if Blanket's mother comes out of the closet. I think the children need to stay together no matter where they go. What are wills for if they are not upheld? Michael wanted his mother to take care of his children, but for the life of me I don not understand why with Joe Jackson there.







This part is optional!


Note: Your comment will post in 5 minutes. Practice patience and don't double your efforts. Thank you.

X17 Mobile
X17 on Twitter!
Sell Your Scoop
Hot Pix