« Photographic Evidence That Tori Spelling Eats! | Main | X17 XCLUSIVE - Nahla's First Time At SeaWorld! »

Michael's Mother Heads To Court Today To Argue For Custody Of His Three Kids

katherinecustody.jpg

The three children Michael left behind, Prince Michael, Paris and Prince Michael II, have been in the custody of their grandmother since the singer's untimely death, and today Katherine Jackson will go to court to seek legal custody of her grandchildren, reports the AP.

Legal experts agree that Debbie Rowe, Jackson's ex-wife and the mother of Prince Michael and Paris, has the most legitimate shot at custody of her children (who are reportedly the result of artificial insemination with an anonymous sperm donor) - if she wants it. And even though she's retained her parental rights, she would still have to undergo an evaluation to determine whether or not she's the best person to care for the kids.

But Debbie has yet to make her intentions known. So far, the only thing Rowe's said on the matter, through her attorney, Marta Almli, is: "Ms. Rowe’s only thoughts at this time have been regarding the devastating loss Michael’s family has suffered. Ms. Rowe requests that Michael’s family, and particularly the children, be spared such harmful, sensationalist speculation and that they be able to say goodbye to their loved one in peace.”

The mother of Jackson's youngest, Prince Michael II, remains a mystery and splitting up the children may also be a consideration for the court.

Additionally the three kids' godfather, British actor Mark Lester may also petition for custody.

Other reports claim Michael wanted his longtime nanny (who was recently fired), Grace Rwaramba, to have custody of the three kids if something were to happen to him.

Attorney Gloria Allred, who is not involved in this case, says that "If [Michael] did indicate a preference, that will be given great weight, but that will not be determinative. Children are not property, they cannot be willed to another person."

Michael's wishes on the matter aren't clear, but the family has indicated they'd put up a fight to keep the children with their grandmother, who is 79.

Who do YOU think the kids would be better off with?



Their grandmother might be a good caretaker, but she DOES still live with her husband who I suspect is not the best parental figure!

SEE MORE:
  >   Michael Jackson Was There In Spirit ... - Sep 13, 2009
  >   MJ Is A "Magnet For Miracles" - Sep 13, 2009
  >   Michael Jackson Tribute Concert Postponed Until Next Year - Sep 11, 2009
  >   Michael Jackson Trailer To Premiere During The 2009 VMAs - Sep 10, 2009
  >   Randy Jackson Slams Media Coverage Of MJ's Funeral - Sep 06, 2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://x17online.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/23685

COMMENTS
Posted by: Anonymous

Although I firmly believe that Debbie Rowe should not get those kids, I don't think the grandparents should either. Obviously sometime went wrong with the upbringing that Michael had, why subject three more kids to that craziness.



Posted by: Anonymous

They should be placed where they will have the best chance to grow up in a stable, loving environment where they will be protected and not exploited and used a publicity pawn or cash cow like Anna Nicole's daughter was. I wish for the best possible outcome to prevail in thier custody and in the rest of thier childhood.



Posted by: Anonymous

79 and raising 3 children!!?? I don't think so! Look at what a mess she and Joe made of their children - they're all kooks. Michael was so ashamed of being who he was - a gay black man, that he turned himself into a white, wig-wearing, woman.



Posted by: Anonymous

the Jackson grandparents, aunts and uncles are too dyfuntional to raise children in a stable environment - visits only for them

Mark Lester is rumored to be the bio father
of Prince and Paris - but he already is a divorced father of 4 and lives in England - far away from the Jacksons

forget Debbie Rowe - she gave up the children for money in the past - and she is a stranger to them

Grace Rwaramba is the best person of them all - stable, educated, like a mother to the children - she's known them since birth

taking into account the wishes of MJ and his children, let the judge decide



Posted by: . • .∀№ηλ][\i/][oῧs. • .

The kids shouldn't be placed under the guardianship of the aging grandmother! Let her have physical custody, if they are comfortable with her. Guardianship and decisions should be left to Marlon who lives a normal life working in a grocery store in San Diego. He is the only one of the bunch that seems to have any sense of grounding! He works for living and has been stable and married for over 30 years!



Posted by: Anonymous

907
u have a way with words! rotfl



Posted by: goey

Janet would make a good mom?



Posted by: Anonymous

I think Janet Jackson should be given custody. She has her own money and wouldn't use them for that. The others especially Jermaine and LaToya mmmmmmmmmmhhhhhhhhh let me think? They always put their brother down



Posted by: Anonymous

Artificial insemination from a private donor ? Meaning that Michael Jackson was not the father of any of those children. Those children belong to the real mother or mothers.



Posted by: Anonymous

Grace Rwaramba should have custody of all three children....and ANYBODY with ANY influence should get behind her and help her save these children.
Michael wanted to save the world and couldn't,not even himself....the least we can do is save his kids.



Posted by: Anonymous

Why would Michael want someone who he recently fired, like Grace Rwaramba, to have custody of his kids if something were to happen to him??



Posted by: hailei_2007

I think the last thing he would have wanted is for his molesting old parents to have custody of the babies. They should be given to the nanny that raised them and has been with them their whole life. In no way should the children be separated. They are to each other the only bounds they've known in this life and blanket needs his older brothers as he grows up



Posted by: Anonymous

Grace Rwaramba was "fired" in dec 08 because MJ had not been able to pay her since oct 08 and they clashed over his drug use - she was not just a nanny watching that the kids are fed, clean and safe - since they are homeschooled, she was tutoring them



Posted by: Lori

The most normal seems to be the god father. Why put them in the same house as Joe Jackson? That would just be damning the poor kids.



Posted by: xxx mwaaaahhhh xxx ly michael

i think one of michaels stable siblings should have the kids or their godfather because michael odviousli trusted him with his kids if he made him godfather but they shouldent go back to their mum that gave them up and they shouldent get looked after by there pedophilic grandparents or their nanny that their DAD fired and i realy hope for their sakes that they go to someone who will love them and raise them like there dad would have wanted then to have been raised x



Posted by: Anonymous

the nanny grace should have the kids...good luck grace. If there is a god, let him be merciful and let the kids be loved by Grace, who has loved them for so long...she knows them best by all reports.



Posted by: Anonymous

the nanny grace should have the kids...good luck grace. If there is a god, let him be merciful and let the kids be loved by Grace, who has loved them for so long...she knows them best by all reports.



Posted by: xxx mwaaahh xxx

the nanny shouldent get them because michaelfired her so obv didnt want her with his kids



Posted by: Anonymous

Who ever gets them sure hope they teach them not to put their Faith in the things of this world. Hope they introduce them to the real King!!!!! The King of Kings and the Lord of Lords. Our Jesus Christ!!!! cinbest







This part is optional!


Note: Your comment will post in 5 minutes. Practice patience and don't double your efforts. Thank you.

X17 Mobile
X17 on Twitter!
Sell Your Scoop
Hot Pix