I Hate To Say It...

she looks kinda dirty to me.

ew.

dirty hot!

Why does this media outlet keep rewarding BG and SM by pushing idea that they are "pretty" people? It must be another PR tactic to whitewash their image, as if saying that they are pretty will make people forget about how poorly they have and continue to conduct themselves. As always, she looks old, worn out, and used up. 27 yo olds are not supposed to look like this.

There is nothing pretty about a 27 yo woman who has to compete with a mother and her 4 kids for a man and who never takes responsibility for her actions. She thinks receiving an award is an open invitation to resume flaunting her affair with a married man who has yet to file for a divorce? She is her own worst enemy and these photo-ops just make her look even more pathetic and desperate. The awards show isn't until a few days and it's in LV, so she is only in LA to update the public and the married man's family on the stauts of her very public affair. She must still be upset over the fact that the married man dressed up and took a bath when he went dining with his wife, rather than sporting his usual "I've been on a binge with SM" drugged out look.

Why is she wearing a cross when she has made it her mission in life to hurt an innocent mother and her 4 kids? This is the wrong move to be making especially since she only arrived in LA to spend "quality time" with the married man and pay him to walk the red carpet with her.

It is offensive to see her wearing the cross around the neck unless she changes her ways and cease the adulterous relationship with a married father of four/or other married men/guys in committed relationship. The reason why so many people dislike her is her unapologetic amoral behavior.
Whatever little talent/passable acting she may have is being surpassed by her personal life. She dresses up like a child to pass on her "signature?? style of bohemian look" which will suit a teenager, not a 27 year old. She appears to be a good-time girl (men know it) but has no substance, no moral fiber. So, perhaps, the wearing of the cross she hopes will deflect more negative talks about her. Walk the walk of a Christian and maybe people will respect you again.
Please no more PDA shots of her with Getty while she is in the US since she is sort of fond of cross necklace for now. Do we really think she is following the Christian path???

She looks a thousand times better than Lindsay. At least you are going on and on about her today. Enjoying the break? We are too.

Wearing a cross doesnt make you a Christian. Why would anyone think it does? One would be wise not to judge based on outwardly appearance. Nothing is ever as it seems. WHO sits on the throne of your heart? Is the ? we should ALL ask ourselves.

They say beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Gorgeous? I think not!

Once again,another hypocrite. Anonymous 11:58 am . You spent 3 paragraphs trashing this woman bc as you say she is having an affair with a married man. You say that she is hurting a woman with 4 kids? Did you even stop to think for one second about the man? Whats his responsibility in all this? NONE??? I mean if this is true, don't you think he has mind of his own and dont you think he is the one that is causing all the hurt? That he is the one who is breaking his vows??? You call her a homewrecker? The only home wrecker is the person that is actively doing the cheating. Why are people so fucking stupid and always blame the third party??? Especially if it's a woman, of course!

Anony 11:20PM
No, the only hypocrites are SM and the following that she seems to attract.
The blame doesn't lie with those that won't condone SM public humilation of a mother and her 4 kids. The problem lies with people like you who are ALWAYS trying to dimish/ignore SM role in this affair. Here's the problem with your logic.

1)You are trying to justify SM behavior by redefining cheating. No matter how you spin it cheating is cheating and it doesn't matter what title the person holds(single/married). If you are sleeping with someone else's spouse/significant other, guess what? YOU ARE CHEATING. Since SM slept with RG husband(and we know this courtesy of SM herself), she is CHEATING. And what exactly is "actively cheating"? Putting the word actively in front of cheating means nothing because no matter how you look at it cheating is cheating.

2) Do you understand the meaning of third parties? Being labeled as the third party means that the person SHOULD NOT BE THERE/that they are interfering. So you just contradicted yourself and supported exactly what I was saying about SM being responsible because she didn't reject the married man's sexual advances.

3) In what world do you live in where people are not responsible for their OWN actions? People blame the third parties because they ENCOURAGE the affair(don't say no or walk away). Since it wasn't an accidental trip and fall that landed SM into BG's bed and she slept with him knowing that he was married and continues to sleep with him despite the fact that he is still married, she is just as guilty as BG.

4)So SM isn't at fault because she didn't take vows? Is that what you're saying? Well guess what that's a DOUBLE STANDARD. You claim that SM is a victim of double standards because people blame her and not the man, then you turn around and commit the biggest double standard of them all. Saying that SM gets a free pass because she didn't take the vows/that the sole responsibility lies on BG because he took the vows implies that women should not be accoutable for their actions when they participate in affairs and that women have the right to disrespect other women.

5) Contrary to the nonsense that SM and her fans are always spewing, BG has received just as much blame and criticism as SM. The major difference is that BG has the common sense to LAY LOW, SHUT UP, and not tip off the papz. When he lost his role on BS what did he do? He laid low. When SM lost her movie role, what did she do? It wasn't a good idea for SM to whine about there being no sisterhood when there are pictures of her allowing the married man to suck her breasts. It wasn't a good idea to have the woman who sat right next to her as she was playing the other woman defend her actions with another woman's husband. She wasn't justified in whining about how someone is misteating her when she is having a very public affair with another woman's husband.

6)Isn't it hypocritical to criticize others for not condoning SM antics, while you completely ignore how SM has used the media to wage a war against RG and her 4 kids? Oh, that's right. You SM fans have one rule for SM and a different rule for everyone else. While it's okay for her to humilate a mother and her 4 kids, it's not okay for someone to call her out on this.

And this is the ultimate flaw in your logic: True or false, SM publicly blamed JL nanny for the affair? True. And using your logic, SM had no right to do this because the nanny was the third party and wasn't the one who made a promise to SM. By your logic SM and her mothers were out of line because the nanny wasn't "actively" cheating. Why criticize others when SM herself berated JL nanny for doing the exact same thing that she is doing to RG? See even SM holds the other woman just as responsible as the man, so stop trying to diminish/ignore the role that she is playing in the affair.

Anon 11:20
4)So SM isn't at fault because she didn't take vows? Is that what you're saying? Well guess what that's a DOUBLE STANDARD. You claim that SM is a victim of double standards because people blame her and not the man, then you turn around and commit the biggest double standard of them all. Saying that SM gets a free pass because she didn't take the vows/that the sole responsibility lies on BG because he took the vows implies that women should not be accoutable for their actions when they participate in affairs and that women have the right to disrespect other women.

5) Contrary to the nonsense that SM and her fans are always spewing, BG has received just as much blame and criticism as SM. The major difference is that BG has the common sense to LAY LOW, SHUT UP, and not tip off the papz. When he lost his role on BS what did he do? He laid low. When SM lost her movie role, what did she do? It wasn't a good idea for SM to whine about there being no sisterhood when there are pictures of her allowing the married man to suck her breasts. It wasn't a good idea to have the woman who sat right next to her as she was playing the other woman defend her actions with another woman's husband. She wasn't justified in whining about how someone is misteating her when she is having a very public affair with another woman's husband.

6)Isn't it hypocritical to criticize others for not condoning SM antics, while you completely ignore how SM has used the media to wage a war against RG and her 4 kids? Oh, that's right. You SM fans have one rule for SM and a different rule for everyone else. While it's okay for her to humilate a mother and her 4 kids, it's not okay for someone to call her out on this.

And this is the ultimate flaw in your logic: True or false, SM publicly blamed JL nanny for the affair? True. And using your logic, SM had no right to do this because the nanny was the third party and wasn't the one who made a promise to SM. By your logic SM and her mothers were out of line because the nanny wasn't "actively" cheating. Why criticize others when SM herself berated JL nanny for doing the exact same thing that she is doing to RG? See even SM holds the other woman just as responsible as the man, so stop trying to diminish/ignore the role that she is playing in the affair.

Anony 11:20PM

And this is the ultimate flaw in your logic: True or false, SM publicly blamed JL nanny for the affair? True. And using your logic, SM had no right to do this because the nanny was the third party and wasn't the one who made a promise to SM. By your logic SM and her mothers were out of line because the nanny wasn't "actively" cheating. Why criticize others when SM herself berated JL nanny for doing the exact same thing that she is doing to RG? See even SM holds the other woman just as responsible as the man, so stop trying to diminish/ignore the role that she is playing in the affair.

Apparantly SM thinks that wearing a cross makes her a Christian. And since SM is the one wearing a cross while she is sleeping with a married man, SM needs to re-evaluate who is sitting at the throne of her heart. Nothing is as it seems? SM is sleeping with a married man and whining about her pain as she shamelessly flaunts the affair, so who really is trying to make a mockery out of religion?

I wear rosaries and I am not Catholic. I just like them. Maybe the cross is just fashion. I don't care what Sienna has done I like her style and movie acting. No one is perfect..and you guys just sit at home and judge..who gives a shit