tigernonude.jpg

Tiger's bringin' out the big guns!

This just in: Tiger Woods' UK lawyers now have a court order forbidding all British publications - printed or online - from publishing "any photographs, footage or images taken or obtained of the claimant naked or any naked parts of the claimant's body or of him involved in any sexual activity."

Damn! Guess we won't be seeing any revealing pix or video of Tiger soon. So does this mean such content definitely exists?

The letter being sent 'round also has this to say: "Our client [Tiger Woods] is not aware of any images and in any event he would not have consented to any such photographs being taken nor would he have consented to the dissemination or exploitation of the same."

Guess that's a no! Well, sorta.